The United States administration is reportedly discussing a plan that would offer large cash payments to every resident of Greenland. The idea is part of broader talks about bringing the Arctic island under U.S. control. Reports say the amount being discussed ranges from $10,000 to as much as $100,000 per person.
Greenland has a small population of about 57,000 people. If every resident received such a payment, the total cost could range from more than $500 million to nearly $6 billion. Officials involved in the discussions believe this cost could still be lower than long-term military and strategic spending in the region.
The proposal has drawn global attention because it involves questions of sovereignty, international law, and security. Greenland is currently governed by Denmark, though it has its own local government. Both Greenlandic and Danish authorities have clearly stated that the island is not for sale.
Why the US is focusing on Greenland
Greenland holds a very important position on the world map. It sits in the Arctic, between North America and Europe. This location makes it valuable for military monitoring, shipping routes, and early warning systems.
U.S. officials believe control over Greenland would strengthen national security. They argue that activity by rival global powers in the Arctic has increased. Melting ice has opened new sea routes and access to minerals, making the region more competitive.
Experts believe the island holds large reserves of rare earth minerals. Industries use these minerals in advanced technology, including defense systems, electronics, and clean energy tools. Governments and companies consider access to these resources critical for maintaining technological strength.
Supporters of the idea say Denmark does not have enough resources to fully defend and monitor the vast island. They claim the U.S. already spends money defending the region and could do so more effectively with full control.
While officials have raised the idea of acquiring Greenland before, recent reports show that they are taking internal discussions more seriously. They are now considering higher payment amounts, demonstrating a stronger push behind the proposal.
Cash payments and the scale of the proposal
At the center of the discussions is a direct payment plan for Greenland’s residents. Instead of only dealing with governments, the idea focuses on financial incentives for people living on the island. Officials have discussed offering each resident a one-time payment. The lowest figure mentioned is $10,000 per person. The highest figure discussed is $100,000 per person.
Officials would present these payments as economic support and a benefit of joining the United States. Greenland has a small population but a massive land area, which makes the cost per person appear high despite the limited total population.
Supporters argue that the government can manage the total cost compared to long-term military investments. Officials have not finalized or approved the payments; they continue to discuss them internally. However, reports indicate that these talks have intensified in recent days, and officials are now considering higher amounts.
Such a plan would be unusual in modern international politics. Direct payments to citizens as part of territorial discussions are rare. This has made the idea controversial and widely debated.
Critics say money cannot decide the future of a territory. They argue that people’s identity, history, and legal status cannot be bought. Supporters respond that economic benefits are often part of political decisions.
Strong pushback from Greenland and Denmark
Authorities in Greenland have strongly rejected the idea. Local leaders have said clearly that Greenland is not for sale and will remain part of Denmark. They have called the proposal disrespectful and unrealistic. Statements from Greenland’s leadership stress that the island’s status is protected by international law. They say decisions about the territory must follow legal and democratic processes, not financial pressure.
Denmark has also rejected the idea. As a NATO ally of the United States, Denmark views the proposal as damaging to trust between partners. Under NATO rules, allies are already committed to defending one another. European leaders have expressed concern as well.
500% tariffs loom as US targets countries still buying Russian oil and uranium
They argue that discussing territorial acquisition undermines stability and cooperation among allies. They warn that such ideas could create tension within established defense agreements.
Despite this pushback, U.S. officials continue to frame the discussions around security needs. They say increased activity by other global powers near Greenland raises concerns. They argue that stronger oversight is necessary to protect the region. The United States and Denmark are expected to continue diplomatic talks. Officials say they are focusing these discussions on security cooperation and Greenland’s status.
However, Greenland’s leaders have repeated that any dialogue must respect existing agreements. The situation highlights a growing focus on the Arctic. As climate change reshapes the region, interest from major powers has increased. Greenland has become a symbol of this new competition, where geography, resources, and security intersect.
For now, the proposal remains under discussion. Greenland’s leaders continue to insist that their territory is not open for sale, regardless of the amount of money offered. The debate has brought renewed attention to the island’s strategic importance and the complex balance between security, sovereignty, and international law.
