Wind power plays a major role in modern electricity systems because it provides low-cost energy, creates jobs, and produces electricity without carbon pollution. However, several large projects in the United States have been halted due to political decisions linked to Donald Trump’s long-standing opposition to windmills, leading to higher electricity costs, job losses, and a tighter energy supply for households and businesses, an issue explained here in clear, simple language focused on facts and easy understanding.
Wind power keeps electricity cheap and clean
Wind power is one of the cheapest sources of electricity available today. Turbines capture moving air and turn it into power. That power flows into the grid and reaches homes, schools, hospitals, and shops.
Most importantly, wind power does not burn fuel. Because of this, it does not release smoke or greenhouse gases. This makes it cleaner than coal and natural gas, which pollute the air and contribute to global warming. At the same time, wind energy costs less. On average, it costs between three and five cents per unit of electricity. This price is lower than coal and close to natural gas. Once companies build turbines, the wind itself is free. Therefore, operating costs stay low.
In addition, modern wind farms spread turbines across wide areas. When wind slows in one place, it often blows in another. Power grids balance this supply with other energy sources, keeping electricity steady.
Despite these benefits, Donald Trump has strongly opposed wind energy for years. His opposition began after wind turbines appeared near one of his golf courses overseas. He argued that turbines spoiled the view. Since then, he has repeatedly attacked wind power in public statements and policy actions.
He has claimed that wind turbines cause serious harm. For example, he has said they damage wildlife and interfere with national security systems. However, studies have not supported these claims. Wind turbines do kill some birds. Still, the numbers remain small compared to other structures. Buildings and power lines kill far more birds every year. Therefore, wind turbines are not the main threat.
Trump has also claimed that offshore wind harms whales. Yet studies of whale populations have found no evidence linking wind turbines to whale deaths. Instead, ships, fishing gear, and warming oceans pose much larger risks. Even so, several offshore wind projects that were already under construction were stopped. These projects were designed to deliver affordable electricity to millions of homes.
Stopping wind projects pushes prices up and cuts jobs
When leaders stop energy projects after construction begins, costs rise quickly. Companies invest billions of dollars in planning, equipment, and labor. When projects end suddenly, those costs do not vanish. Instead, electricity users often pay the price.
The halted offshore wind projects were expected to power around 2.5 million homes. Since construction had already progressed, finishing them would have cost far less than building new power plants from scratch. However, stopping these projects removed a large source of cheap electricity from the system. Utilities then had to rely more on fossil fuels like gas and coal. These fuels cost more and fluctuate in price. As a result, electricity bills increase.
Higher electricity prices affect daily life. Families pay more to cool homes, store food, and charge devices. Small businesses face higher operating costs. Over time, these costs pass on to consumers through higher prices.
Jobs also disappear when wind projects stop. Wind farms create employment in construction, shipping, engineering, and maintenance. Thousands of workers depend on these projects for steady income. Moreover, wind jobs last for decades. Turbines need regular maintenance. Ports support shipping activity. Local services grow around these projects. When projects end, communities lose long-term economic activity.
At the same time, electricity demand continues to grow in the United States. Data centers, digital services, and high-power computing require massive amounts of energy. Without new cheap power sources, meeting this demand becomes harder and more expensive.
Over the past year, average electricity prices in the United States rose by nearly seven percent. Many households already struggle with rising costs. Blocking low-cost wind energy adds further pressure. In addition, relying more on fossil fuels increases exposure to global price swings. Fuel shortages or international disruptions can quickly raise electricity costs. Wind energy helps reduce this risk.
Other countries expand while electricity stays affordable
While wind projects face resistance in the United States, other countries are moving fast to expand clean energy. China offers a clear example of this shift. China leads the world in clean energy capacity. It has built more clean energy infrastructure than any other country. In fact, its installed wind and solar capacity nearly matches that of the rest of the world combined.
Because of this rapid expansion, China has met rising electricity demand without increasing fossil fuel use in power generation. This helps limit pollution and stabilize energy supply. At the same time, electric vehicles have become common.
Supreme Court blocks Trump from sending National Guard into Chicago in rare rebuke
A large share of new vehicle sales use electricity instead of gasoline. This reduces oil demand and increases the importance of affordable electricity. Electricity prices reflect these choices. Residential users in China pay around eight cents per unit of electricity. Businesses and factories pay about eleven cents. These prices remain far lower than in the United States, where the average sits near eighteen cents.
Cheap electricity supports industries that rely on large amounts of power. Manufacturing, technology, and digital services all benefit. Stable energy prices help companies plan and compete globally. In contrast, rising electricity prices in the United States create uncertainty. As demand grows from data centers and digital infrastructure, the lack of new low-cost energy becomes more visible.
